Create Account

Username
Password
Remember me
Email
 
0
Viscera
Viscera

Westminster Confession of Faith Chapter 3

22 comments, 178 views, posted 11:11 am 20/12/2011 in Religion by Viscera
Viscera has 9256 posts, 1097 threads, 1230 points, location: 1123 6536 5321
Jedi Master

Westminster Confession of Faith Chapter 3

Chapter III
Of God's Eternal Decree

I. God from all eternity, did, by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely, and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass;[1] yet so, as thereby neither is God the author of sin,[2] nor is violence offered to the will of the creatures; nor is the liberty or contingency of second causes taken away, but rather established.[3]

II. Although God knows whatsoever may or can come to pass upon all supposed conditions;[4] yet has He not decreed anything because He foresaw it as future, or as that which would come to pass upon such conditions.[5]

III. By the decree of God, for the manifestation of His glory, some men and angels[6] are predestinated unto everlasting life; and others foreordained to everlasting death.[7]

IV. These angels and men, thus predestinated, and foreordained, are particularly and unchangeably designed, and their number so certain and definite, that it cannot be either increased or diminished.[8]

V. Those of mankind that are predestinated unto life, God, before the foundation of the world was laid, according to His eternal and immutable purpose, and the secret counsel and good pleasure of His will, has chosen, in Christ, unto everlasting glory,[9] out of His mere free grace and love, without any foresight of faith, or good works, or perseverance in either of them, or any other thing in the creature, as conditions, or causes moving Him thereunto;[10] and all to the praise of His glorious grace.[11]

VI. As God has appointed the elect unto glory, so has He, by the eternal and most free purpose of His will, foreordained all the means thereunto.[12] Wherefore, they who are elected, being fallen in Adam, are redeemed by Christ,[13] are effectually called unto faith in Christ by His Spirit working in due season, are justified, adopted, sanctified,[14] and kept by His power, through faith, unto salvation.[15] Neither are any other redeemed by Christ, effectually called, justified, adopted, sanctified, and saved, but the elect only.[16]

VII. The rest of mankind God was pleased, according to the unsearchable counsel of His own will, whereby He extends or withholds mercy, as He pleases, for the glory of His sovereign power over His creatures, to pass by; and to ordain them to dishonor and wrath for their sin, to the praise of His glorious justice.[17]

VIII. The doctrine of this high mystery of predestination is to be handled with special prudence and care,[18] that men, attending the will of God revealed in His Word, and yielding obedience thereunto, may, from the certainty of their effectual vocation, be assured of their eternal election.[19] So shall this doctrine afford matter of praise, reverence, and admiration of God;[20] and of humility, diligence, and abundant consolation to all that sincerely obey the Gospel [21]

Source

My Blog

Comments

0
11:16 am 20/12/2011

Viscera

Article 2 is going to cause quite a firestorm in our Sunday School class. The whole issue fo "free will" has come up a few times, and the class doesn't like the "idea" that free will is not in the Bible in regards to who will come to salvation.

0
10:17 pm 20/12/2011

Quaektem

How does this work with the call to evangelize? If it determined who will be saved already what would the point be of calling to spread the word? If they will be saved then the need to be reached out to is redundant, and if they're not going to be saved what's the point in them having to know about it?

0
11:18 pm 20/12/2011

Viscera

the reformed position on this is.....God uses the act of evangelism to enact the election. Ity's a process that isn't necessary from God's pov, but He chose that as the means to the end.

1
2:36 pm 21/12/2011

Vormid

I'd kick you off my porch with the rest of em.

Evangelism refers to the practice of relaying information about a particular set of beliefs to others who do not hold those beliefs.

WHY??? If we wanted to know, we would ask.

0
2:38 pm 21/12/2011

Viscera

There are different ways of evangelism. I for one am not a Bible pounding walk the streets kind. Although I did invite Jehovah's Witnesses into my house for 2 years every Monday. I believe the real impactful way to evangelize is to actually live your faith, others will see it. If a conversation arises from that, then be prepared with a cogent answer.

0
2:46 pm 21/12/2011

Vormid

Yet you do it here.

1
1:23 am 22/12/2011

Quaektem

I would not consider this "covert to Christ" evangelism, rather he's posting about a topic that interests him. You can do what I do when peoplr post about cars or sports (stuff I really couldn't care less about)... ignore it and move on.

Quote by Vormid:
Evangelism refers to the practice of relaying information about a particular set of beliefs to others who do not hold those beliefs.



Not exactly...

Definition of EVANGELISM
1: the winning or revival of personal commitments to Christ
2: militant or crusading zeal

If I were to make a Happy Yule post that references the beliefs and practices of the holiday I am spreading information, I am not seeking your personal conversion to paganism.

0
1:57 am 22/12/2011

Viscera

Quote by Vormid:
Yet you do it here.


not really, no one forces you to read or post do they??? Should I take exception to the porn posted here? Or the downloading of files that is copyright infringement? That would be theft. But yet I don't complain about it, I move on. Maybe that is something you should think about for yourself if the topic is so upsetting to you. But we know the answer to that don't we?

0
2:08 am 22/12/2011

Quaektem

Hey V... did you see the second definition for Evangelism? That's so you!

0
2:21 am 22/12/2011

Viscera

lol, yeah I'm militant, in a zealous kinda way

0
3:05 pm 22/12/2011

Vormid

e·van·gel·ism (-vnj-lzm)
n.
1. Zealous preaching and dissemination of the gospel, as through missionary work.
2. Militant zeal for a cause.

If you don't want comments maybe you should have the threads locked.

0
7:49 pm 22/12/2011

Vormid

Quote by Viscera:
Quote by Vormid:
Yet you do it here.

not really, no one forces you to read or post do they??? Should I take exception to the porn posted here? Or the downloading of files that is copyright infringement? That would be theft. But yet I don't complain about it, I move on. Maybe that is something you should think about for yourself if the topic is so upsetting to you. But we know the answer to that don't we?

What do you mean no not really? How can you say that in your own evangelical post ? You really are very defensive by the way. I never said I had a problem with your post. I just made an observation. You said you don't pound pavement. You do however tap a keyboard to relay unrequested information about your faith on a regular basis.

0
11:13 pm 22/12/2011

Quaektem

In our own way... don't we all?

0
11:29 pm 22/12/2011

Viscera

Quote:
If you don't want comments maybe you should have the threads locked.

didn't realize that could be done, I thoguht it was just a point lock, but there is a thought

0
11:31 pm 22/12/2011

Viscera

Quote by Vormid:
Quote by Viscera:
Quote by Vormid:
Yet you do it here.

not really, no one forces you to read or post do they??? Should I take exception to the porn posted here? Or the downloading of files that is copyright infringement? That would be theft. But yet I don't complain about it, I move on. Maybe that is something you should think about for yourself if the topic is so upsetting to you. But we know the answer to that don't we?


What do you mean no not really? How can you say that in your own evangelical post ? You really are very defensive by the way. I never said I had a problem with your post. I just made an observation. You said you don't pound pavement. You do however tap a keyboard to relay unrequested information about your faith on a regular basis.


I'll wager some real money with you. Previous to this series, I will bet money that if you look back on my last 50 threads, that less then 10% are this topic. And why would that be the case? Because people bitch and moan about it. Like I said, if it isn't your cup of tea, move along. I guarantee that if you look at "categories" that people post in, there are some who post much more in their chosen topics then I do in this one.

1
11:35 pm 22/12/2011

Viscera

btw, in a qucik count, 46 non religious posts (mostly political or sports) and 4 religious. Hardly seems as though your impression is an accurate representation of the truth.

0
11:44 pm 22/12/2011

Quaektem

V, he's liberal. Facts are not a valid counter-argument.

0
11:51 pm 22/12/2011

Viscera

yeah I know, I should know better, but always hoping that he will break out of his self imposed prison of ignorance

0
3:51 am 23/12/2011

Vormid

Quote by Quaektem:
V, he's liberal. Facts are not a valid counter-argument.

I'm not sure what you are arguing to be honest. I never said "all he ever does is evangelize" I just said he did here. I really don't see what the deal is. Why do you feel the need to defend him when he doesn't even need defending?

0
7:31 am 23/12/2011

Viscera

hhmm, maybe because it's coming across that I am being attacked? Not really sure the mystery here. This could all be a misunderstanding, as is often the case here. But consider this. This topic isn't a subject usually brought to a non-believer. It is a discussion within the Christian community, the same way that 2 Wiccans would discuss the particulars of their rituals, or the origins of their particular branch of worship. I didn't exclude anyone from the conversation, but rather just posted the Wesrtminster Confession of Faith. I didn't put forth any opinions in the original text, but rather relayed the reaction that the other men I study with would have. Your first words on the topic were:

Quote:
I'd kick you off my porch with the rest of em.
Evangelism refers to the practice of relaying information about a particular set of beliefs to others who do not hold those beliefs.
WHY??? If we wanted to know, we would ask.

I wasn't offering this as a means of telling you anything, but yet you would kick me off your porch. I'm not sure who you have encountered in your life, but I would be rather surprised if anyone ever came to your porch citing the WCoF. That would be similar to someone wanting to celebrate July 4th and deciding to read the Magna Carta and expect people to be familiar with the reference. Maybe some would, but it certainly would complicate the process.

So in short, I could have said in my first response to you, "This wasn't intended for you as a non-believer" but in the past, when I have said that I have been excoriated as being arrogant, combative etc. So given a 2nd chance, what is your solution? I imagine you are going to say not to post this, but since I didn't do it for the reason you claim I did, then who really has the problem here? me or you? And why is it an option to decide to tell people to stfu on a chat forum, rather then just walk by and not post if it bothers you?

0
1:27 pm 23/12/2011

Vormid

Please point out where I said you should not post this. Please point out where I said it was a problem. Please point out where I said STFU. You posted on a conversation site. I opened joined the conversation. I'm sorry you don't like it. I guess you could follow your own advice and ignore me, right?

You are correct that I do not like being preached to. I would say a polite "No thanks" to you and shut the door on you or anyone else who stood on my porch.

I do indeed wonder why people have the desire to spread the word of god in places other than church. If I wanted it, I would seek it.

0
2:52 pm 23/12/2011

Viscera

No sarcasm or anger here, I don't think you read my last comment. I didn't start the thread for you or people who don't agree to preach to you. I posted it as a conversation with anyone who wanted to have it. Is your idea of starting a conversation saying

Code:
I'd kick you off my porch with the rest of em.

?

Couple that with

Quote:
Evangelism refers to the practice of relaying information about a particular set of beliefs to others who do not hold those beliefs.
WHY??? If we wanted to know, we would ask.

and

Quote:
Yet you do it here.

You then go on to again state that I keep offering unrequested info. Vormid, I could say everyone of your comments is unrequested. I certainly feel that way about others, and so not to start a pissing match I'll use someone who isn't here anymore, IAG. He would come in and drop obscenities left and right being as outrageous or at least as vulgar as possible and then tell me that this is a chat forum, get over it. so again usin your words, when you say

Quote:
What do you mean no not really? How can you say that in your own evangelical post ? You really are very defensive by the way. I never said I had a problem with your post. I just made an observation. You said you don't pound pavement. You do however tap a keyboard to relay unrequested information about your faith on a regular basis.

Both italicized comments are incorrect. I do a whole lot more political threads then religious. Why? Because of the garbage that continually comes back my way. Why is it other boards don't have attack squads when something is posted like this? FB doesn't have roving people who have to spout off about the objections to ewverything.

So I'm sorry if I misinterpreted your response, but I hardly believe the words you used are usually present in a conversation that is engaged without an objection involved. There are specifically 5 people here who regularly comment on my posts with not much less then sarcasm and certainly more often taking umbridge not with the topic of the thread, but the very idea I would make it. Unfortunately I read you as one of them. If I am incorrect I'll work on that.

Add Comment

Log in via teoti, or register to add a comment!


Teh NookMayrHayasdanJaranWebAngryShirtsGoneGeekEat Liver